Skip to main content
GullySystem

Adding Engineers to a Team You Already Run

Staff augmentation adds engineers to your team. They take your tickets, follow your process, and have their code reviewed by your own people, while you keep full direction of the work until the arrangement ends.

Share your requirements

What the first days look like

Access

Access is handled first. Each engineer gets an account in their own name with the narrowest rights that let the work happen, and shared logins are refused because they make clean removal impossible.

Environment

A local setup is the first test. Engineers build the project from your README alone, and every gap they hit is fixed in that file, which also helps the next person you hire.

First change

The first ticket is small. It is a real one, sent through your normal review, and it teaches the build, the branching habit and the tone your reviewers use when they disagree.

Ground rules

Your rules apply as written. Your definition of done, branch naming and meeting times are followed by the newcomers, and any disagreement goes to your lead, never into the code.

Review is where quality is checked

Review rules should be identical. Your lead reads every pull request from outside engineers, the tests run in your pipeline, and nothing merges on the augmenting side’s approval alone. Add a review habit before they arrive. Without review, you cannot tell good work from fast work, and the newcomers, who are keen to please, will not be able to tell either.

When extra hands are the wrong answer

Extra people do not fix unclear priorities. If the backlog is vague or your lead has no time to review, added engineers will simply wait, or guess, and either way you pay for it. A missed deadline is also a poor reason to add hands, because onboarding takes attention from the people who are already behind. Fix the bottleneck first, then add capacity.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How long before an added engineer is useful?

That depends on your codebase. A tidy repository with a working README shortens the wait, a tangled one with missing documents lengthens it, and your lead should expect more work, not less.

Will the engineers use our tools and chat?

Yes, they work in your tools. Your tracker, repository, chat and calendar stay exactly where they are, nothing moves onto our systems, and credentials are issued per person so that removing someone is one step.

Can we end the arrangement early?

Yes, on the agreed notice. Before leaving, each engineer writes down what is in progress, what remains unanswered and anything undocumented, and your lead checks that note before the final day. Access is removed that day.

Who is responsible for the quality of the code?

Your team, because your lead reviews it. The augmenting engineers are responsible for submitting work that meets your standards and passes your tests, and problems found later are raised in review like anyone else’s.

Talk to us

Tell us what you need.

Share your requirements and one of our engineers will come back to you within one business day.

What happens after you share your requirements

  1. A senior engineer reads your answers. Nobody phones first.
  2. Within one business day you get a written note: what we understood, what we would start with, and the questions we still have.
  3. If it fits, a proposal follows with the order of work, what we need from you and what you receive at each step.
  4. No call is booked and nothing is paid until you have read the note. Your details stay with us.

Start with your requirements

Seven short steps that tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads them before anyone gets in touch.

Share your requirements