Skip to main content
GullySystem
AI for HR · Solutions

Read turnover by team and site, so leaders can act on causes.

AI Attrition Prediction reads turnover and exit records for whole groups, such as a site, a department or a grade band, and shows where leaving is rising. Related factors sit beside it. Leaders choose what to try. No individual is scored.

What it is

Resignations feel sudden. Looking back, the pattern sat in the records: a supervisor who loses people every spring, a site with no promotions for two years, a grade band paid below the usual range. The signs belong to groups.

This capability reads those records together and reports on the group. HR sees where turnover is rising, which workplace factors travel with it, and how earlier retention steps turned out for the people they were meant to help. It never picks out a person. Setup needs your exit data and employee database connected first.

Where it goes wrong today

The problems this is meant to ease.

Turnover is counted but never explained

HR knows how many people left last quarter. Nobody has set that number beside manager changes, pay position or refused transfers, so the causes stay guesses and the same exits keep repeating.

One weak team hides inside a fair average

A company-wide turnover figure looks acceptable while one branch loses its technicians every year. The average gives the owner no reason to look.

Exit interviews sit in folders

Notes are free text, written by different interviewers. With no shared reason list, leavers over pay cannot be counted apart from leavers over a supervisor.

Retention steps are never measured

A bonus or a transfer rule is introduced, then forgotten. A year on, nobody can say whether leaving fell in the group it was meant to help.

Guessing about individuals breeds mistrust

Managers start naming who is about to quit. Staff find that unfair, and HR ends up holding the wrong conversations with the wrong people, on the strength of one manager’s hunch.

Inside the module

What AI attrition prediction does.

Turnover trends over time

Leavers are counted by month, site, department and grade band, so HR can tell whether leaving is rising, flat or seasonal across several years of records. One year alone hides the pattern.

Retention indicators for groups

Tenure mix, time since the last promotion, vacancy age and overtime load are summarised for each group, with small groups merged into larger ones. Nobody can be picked out of a figure.

Workplace factors beside turnover

Manager changes, shift pattern, pay position and refused transfers are set next to turnover for the same group. That shows the HR head which factors travel together.

Group-level forecast

Expected leavers are projected for a department or site from its own history and shown as a range, never a single figure. Teams too small to forecast are marked so.

Retention initiatives to consider

For each pattern the page offers a short list of steps to weigh, such as a pay review or a supervisor coaching plan. Both HR and the owner choose. The outcome is logged.

Privacy built into the reports

Reports show groups only. No employee is ranked or marked as a likely leaver. Access by role is logged, and exit notes are coded to a reason list that you define yourself.

Initiative results tracked

Each retention step is dated, so turnover can be compared across the date for the group it was meant to help. Results show what moved.

Where it gets used

What this looks like in a working week.

A hospital losing nurses from one ward

Exit reasons and shift records show the same ward losing staff after a night rotation change. The matron and HR review the rota with the ward sister. Later turnover shows whether it helped.

A security agency with guard turnover by site

Leavers are compared by client site, travel distance and overtime load. The owner sees which postings lose guards. Then the roster or the site allowance can be changed for those postings alone.

A logistics firm losing drivers after probation

Tenure bands show that most leaving happens in the first season. The operations head studies induction and first-month routes, then tries one change in a single depot to see what happens.

A supermarket chain with cashier turnover

Stores are compared on weekend rota, store manager changes and pay against the grade range. Head office picks two stores for a pilot. The trend tells it more.

A staffing agency with recruiters moving on

Leaving is grouped by team lead and commission plan. The founder reads which plan travels with the highest turnover, then revises it together with finance. Later months show the effect.

Who touches it

The people who open this every day.

HR head

Reads group trends monthly and picks retention steps with the owner. Each step tried is logged with its start day.

Department head

Sees their own department only. Sharing that view is the HR head’s choice.

Founder or director

Compares sites and grades to find where people keep leaving. Then asks HR for the reasons.

How it is set up

From first conversation to daily use.

  1. Discovery with HR and the owner

    List the decisions that turnover figures should inform, and agree the groups to report on. Then check which sites, grades and exit forms already exist in the employee database today.

  2. Data readiness

    Clean the joining and leaving dates, merge duplicate employee numbers, and agree one reason list for exits. Past leavers are loaded too. Patterns need history.

  3. Trial on one department

    Run the group reports on one department or site, using its real leavers. Minimum group sizes come first. No figure may point at one person.

  4. Review with HR and a department head

    HR and one department head read the trial reports. They say what looks wrong. Reason codes and group boundaries change until they match how the business really runs, department by department.

  5. Going live

    Monthly reports are switched on for every site. Access roles are set. The HR head decides which department heads see their own group, and nothing is shared by default.

  6. Review afterwards

    After a few cycles, HR checks whether the reports led to any decisions. Unused views are dropped. Each logged retention step is read against the later trend, group by group.

Measuring it

How you would know it is working.

Record where you stand before it goes live, so the change is measured against your own figures.

  • Voluntary turnover rate is measured per site, department and grade band, and the baseline is the leavers already recorded in the employee database before go-live.
  • Retention trend is the movement in tenure and leaving month by month, with the earlier baseline read from joining and leaving dates you already hold.
  • Intervention outcome compares turnover in a group before and after a logged retention step, and its starting figure is the period just before that step.
  • Reason code coverage counts leavers who have a coded exit reason, and the baseline is the number of exit interview forms completed before go-live.
Used responsibly

Where a person stays in charge.

No individual is labelled

The software reports on groups. It does not rank, score or flag any named employee as likely to leave, and a request to add that view is declined by design.

Small groups are merged

A team below the minimum size is rolled into a larger group, so that a figure cannot point at one person. HR sets that minimum with whoever looks after data protection. That is a setting.

People decide every step

A retention initiative stays a suggestion until HR and the owner approve it. Pay, promotion and dismissal are never decided from a turnover report. People do that.

Staff-data rules vary by place

Rules for analysing employee records change between countries, so your own lawyer or privacy adviser agrees the setup. Figures are prepared here. Legal conclusions are not drawn.

Thin history shows as thin

A company with few past exits gets loose signals, and the report says so plainly beside every chart. Forecasts are ranges. They are never a verdict on a team.

How it fits

It is one part of a system, not an island.

A module earns its place by what it passes to the next one. These are the connections we set up most often.

  • Employee database
  • Exit and offboarding
  • Performance management
  • Payroll management
  • Leave and holiday management
Common questions

Questions owners ask about AI attrition prediction.

Does the software tell me who will resign?

No. It reports on groups such as a site or a grade band, and it never names or scores an individual. Leaders use it to find causes. Watching people is not its job.

How much history is needed before the trends mean anything?

Several years of clean joining, leaving and reason records help most. A company with only a few exits each year should read the output as a loose hint. It is no verdict.

Who can see the reports?

Only the roles you grant, usually the HR head and a few department heads looking at their own group. Every view is logged. Tiny groups are never shown.

Can it be used to decide pay, promotion or dismissal?

It should not be. The reports describe groups and cannot judge one person, so those choices stay with managers who can explain them face to face.

What does it connect to?

It reads your employee database, exit forms, payroll bands and leave records. A system with no export needs a one-time data load, and that is agreed at the start.

What if our leave and exit records are patchy?

Tidy them first. We can help move them into one employee database, and the reports become worth switching on once a year or so of consistent entries exists behind them.

Is it worth the effort for a small company?

With a few dozen staff and a handful of exits, the owner usually knows the reasons already. It starts to matter across several sites, shifts or grades.

What does it cost and how long is the setup?

Effort depends on how many systems hold your staff records and how clean they are. We scope it after looking at your data. The quote is in writing.

Talk to us

Tell us how you handle AI attrition prediction today.

A spreadsheet, a register or another system: say which, and we will tell you plainly what is worth changing.

  • No obligation
  • A reply within one business day
  • Your details stay private

Start with your requirements

Seven short steps that tell us what you need. An engineer reads them before getting in touch.

Share your requirements