Skip to main content
GullySystem
Applicant Tracking · Solutions

Give the hiring panel one shared page per candidate.

Collaboration Management gives a hiring panel one shared page per candidate: the CV, each round’s score, the two lines every interviewer wrote, and who is waiting on whom. Feedback stops living in forwarded WhatsApp messages. The department head and the owner review the same notes, not two different memories of the same candidate.

What it is

Three people interview a candidate on three days. The first says he is fine for the plant, the second says his customer-facing communication is weak for the counter, and the third never hears either opinion. On Friday the owner asks what everyone thought.

A shared candidate page holds all of it: scores, notes and the reason someone objected. Each entry is dated and signed by name.

What it replaces

What your team uses today.

The module takes over these, one at a time, so nothing has to stop while it is set up.

  • A WhatsApp group for the panel
  • Forwarded CVs with comments typed above them
  • A sheet of scores kept by HR
Where it goes wrong today

The problems this is meant to ease.

Feedback scattered over chats

Interviewers reply in private messages and groups. The HR executive stitches the views together by hand.

Scores with no reasons

Ratings arrive bare. A number or a thumbs-up comes in, and later nobody can say why a candidate was turned down.

Waiting with no name on it

A decision stalls because an interviewer has not replied. Nobody sees whose reply is owed.

Memories that differ

Recall differs. The department head and the owner remember the same interview differently, so the decision becomes a debate about who remembers better.

Pay details shared too widely

Salary expectations travel in forwarded messages. Panel members see figures they had no need to know.

Inside the module

What collaboration management does.

One page the panel shares

CV, application, interview notes and messages are open to everyone interviewing for that vacancy and nobody else.

Short feedback

A score and two lines per round. Long forms get skipped, so the form is kept to what an interviewer will actually type.

Feedback still owed

The page shows which panel member still owes feedback. Each late reviewer gets a prompt in the channel they actually read, so nobody phones round chasing comments.

Private and shared notes

Something meant for the owner alone stays there. What the panel should see is marked shared.

The decision, with a name

Selected, held or dropped is recorded with who decided and when, so the reason is readable six months later.

Salary kept out of view

Interviewers see the candidate and not what he asked for. Only HR and the owner see the figure.

Where it gets used

What this looks like in a working week.

Illustrative scenarios, written to show the shape of the work. They are not accounts of client systems.

After a round of interviews

Interviews end. Each panellist adds a score and a few lines to the candidate’s page, and the HR executive sees who has not written yet.

The head and the owner disagree

They open the same page. Objections sit beside recommendations, and each decision is recorded against the panellist who made the call.

A candidate asks what was promised

HR opens the page. It shows what was said to the candidate and by whom, and then the reply goes out.

Pay stays private

The panel sees skills and scores. Expected salary shows to the people the owner has allowed, and to nobody else.

Who touches it

The people who open this every day.

HR executive

Sets up the panel, collects the feedback, and follows up with the person who has not written anything.

Department head

Reads the earlier rounds before the next interview, so the trade test covers what the phone screen missed.

Owner or partner

Sees the whole panel’s view on one screen and decides, even from outside the office.

How it is set up

From first conversation to daily use.

  1. Walk through a recent hire

    Tell us about the last hire. You describe how it was decided and who took part, and we write back the rounds and roles.

  2. Set the feedback form

    You pick the scores and questions panellists answer. A short form comes back to try on a sample candidate.

  3. Decide who sees what

    Privacy is set early. The owner says which notes stay private and who sees pay, and a screen for each role comes back to check.

  4. Run a live vacancy

    Try a real opening. The panel uses the page with HR beside them, and a list of changes they asked for comes back.

Measuring it

How you would know it is working.

Record where you stand before it goes live, so the change is measured against your own figures.

  • Feedback still owed after a round, by interviewer
  • Candidates decided with a recorded reason, against all decided
  • Gap between the last interview and a recorded decision
  • Candidates on whom the panel disagreed, and how it was settled
  • Notes marked private against notes shared
How it fits

It is one part of a system, not an island.

A module earns its place by what it passes to the next one. These are the connections we set up most often.

  • Candidate tracking
  • Interview scheduling
  • Resume management
  • WhatsApp
  • Roles and permissions
Common questions

Questions owners ask about collaboration management.

Why not use a WhatsApp group for the panel?

For one vacancy, a group is fine and everybody already has it. The trouble starts at the second and third vacancy, when messages about four candidates run together and nothing can be found after the week is over.

Will interviewers fill in feedback?

Only if it is short and reaches them where they already are: a score, two lines, and a link that opens on the phone. The form is usually cut in half during set-up, after watching one real round.

Does every interviewer need a login?

Yes, one each, because the notes carry a name. A visiting consultant who sits on one panel can be limited to that vacancy alone, for as long as it is open.

Can the owner see everything without being asked?

Yes. Owner access covers every vacancy, note and score. That is your choice at set-up, and some firms keep the partners out of the early rounds.

What shapes the cost of a shared hiring page?

Panel size matters. So do the rounds you run and the links to candidate tracking and scheduling. Permission rules add some work. The quotation is itemised, and private notes can be dropped if you do not need them.

What decides when a panel can start using it?

Hiring stages matter. The release for panels holds the candidate page, feedback form and decision record. The stages and the list of panellists come from you, and each step is dated in the proposal.

Talk to us

Tell us how you handle collaboration management today.

A spreadsheet, a register or another system: say which, and we will tell you plainly what is worth changing.

What happens after you share your requirements

  1. A senior engineer reads your answers. Nobody phones first.
  2. Within one business day you get a written note: what we understood, what we would start with, and the questions we still have.
  3. If it fits, a proposal follows with the order of work, what we need from you and what you receive at each step.
  4. No call is booked and nothing is paid until you have read the note. Your details stay with us.

Start with your requirements

Seven short steps that tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads them before anyone gets in touch.

Share your requirements