Skip to main content
GullySystem
Procurement · Solutions

Send one enquiry to several vendors, and compare the replies line by line.

An enquiry goes out to the vendors you choose, comes back as rates against the same list of items, and lands in a comparison whose columns line up. Freight, taxes and delivery time sit next to the rate. Once you pick a quote, the order is raised from it, and the reason you picked it stays on the file.

What it is

One vendor quotes per piece, the second per kilo, and the third includes transport and does not say so. The junior copies all three into a sheet at nine at night, makes one mistake in a column, and the order goes to the wrong vendor. It happens often.

The enquiry is sent once, with the same item list to every vendor. Replies are entered as they arrive, whether on WhatsApp, on email or over the phone. Rate, freight, tax and delivery stand side by side on one screen, so the cheapest rate no longer wins on its own.

What it replaces

What your team uses today.

The module takes over these, one at a time, so nothing has to stop while it is set up.

  • A comparison sheet built by hand
  • Quote requests on chat
  • Folders of vendor PDFs
  • The memory of who quoted less last time
Where it goes wrong today

The problems this is meant to ease.

Enquiries sent unevenly

Some vendors get the full item list and others a summary on chat. Their replies cannot be compared. Nobody notices.

Rates for different things

A vendor quotes a different size or grade. Put into the same line, it looks comparable. It is not.

Low rate, dear terms

Freight, loading and a short credit period are left out of the comparison. The cheapest rate turns out costly.

Quotes scattered across channels

Replies arrive as PDFs, photographs and voice notes. Someone retypes them into a sheet at night.

Reasons for the award forgotten

The vendor was chosen for delivery or quality, and nothing says so. A later audit asks why.

Inside the module

What RFQ and quote comparison does.

One enquiry, many vendors

Items, quantity, delivery place and the date you need it, sent to a shortlist in one action and tracked until they reply. Nobody is left out.

Quotes against the same lines

Every vendor answers the line you asked about. A rate quoted for a different size is recorded as that. That keeps the comparison honest.

Landed cost, not just rate

Freight, loading, tax and payment terms are added, because the low rate with a short credit period is often the dearer one.

The comparison on one screen

Vendors across and items down, with the lowest on each line marked. Split the order across two vendors if that is what you decide.

Why you chose that vendor

A line of reason against the award: earlier delivery, better material, or a vendor who has never let you down in the rainy season. It is a record.

Straight into a purchase order

The chosen quote becomes the order at the rates quoted, without retyping.

What the same item cost last time

Earlier quotes for that item, with dates. You can see whether the market moved or only the vendor did.

Where it gets used

What this looks like in a working week.

Illustrative scenarios, written to show the shape of the work. They are not accounts of client systems.

A site needs cement and steel

The site engineer lists items and the delivery date. Next, the executive in purchase sends the enquiry to a shortlist together. Vendors get the same list.

Replies come in

Rates are keyed against the same lines. A photograph of a handwritten quote is attached beside its entry.

Comparing landed cost

Freight, tax and credit terms are added. The screen shows vendors across and items down, with the better rate on each line marked.

Awarding the order

The owner splits the order between a pair of vendors and writes a line of reason. A purchase order follows at the quoted rates.

Who touches it

The people who open this every day.

Purchase executive

Sends the enquiry, chases the replies and enters what comes back. The list is short.

Site engineer

Raises the requirement with the specification needed, and sees who promised which date.

Owner

Approves the award above a value set in advance. Sees the whole comparison, not only the winner.

How it is set up

From first conversation to daily use.

  1. Walking through a recent purchase

    We trace a purchase from need to order. You hand over the vendor list and a past comparison sheet. A written note shows where steps could be tightened.

  2. Item and vendor lists

    Item names, units and vendor contacts are loaded. Duplicates are corrected by the buying team.

  3. Enquiry and comparison layout

    You see the enquiry screen and the comparison grid. You say which terms must appear beside each rate. Gaps are noted.

  4. A live enquiry beside the old sheet

    A real requirement is run both ways. Purchase and the owner review any difference in outcome.

  5. Approval rules and habit

    If awards need approval, the rule is set. The team is trained and the shared sheet is retired.

Measuring it

How you would know it is working.

Record where you stand before it goes live, so the change is measured against your own figures.

  • Enquiries sent, and vendors who replied
  • Awards made to a vendor with a higher rate, with the reasons
  • Difference between quoted and landed cost
  • Enquiries still open past the reply date
  • Purchase orders raised from a recorded quote
How it fits

It is one part of a system, not an island.

A module earns its place by what it passes to the next one. These are the connections we set up most often.

  • Vendor management
  • Purchase orders
  • Workflow and approvals
  • Goods receipt
  • WhatsApp and email
Common questions

Questions owners ask about RFQ and quote comparison.

Is this needed if we buy from the same two suppliers every time?

Probably not yet. Two suppliers and a known rate need a phone call and not a process. Ask again when a project carries forty material heads, or when a client wants to see that you compared.

What if vendors send PDFs and photographs of handwritten quotes?

They are attached to the vendor’s row, and the rates are keyed in from them. Reading a quotation automatically is possible, though it handles a clean PDF far better than a photograph shot at an angle.

Can an award wait for approval?

Yes. Above a value you set, the comparison goes to the owner or the project head, and the order cannot be printed until they agree. The approval is dated and kept.

Does this need us to change how vendors quote?

No, and asking them to change is how these things die. They send what they always send. Your team enters it once against a common list.

What shapes the price of a quote comparison tool?

Vendor numbers, item lists and approval layers shape it. Links to purchase orders and goods receipt are separate pieces. Once we have studied how you buy, every piece is listed on its own row, and any part you do not want can be deleted.

What decides when buyers can use it?

How tidy your item and vendor lists are sets the pace. Sending enquiries, recording rates and comparing landed cost come first. Past sheets from you are useful. Calendar dates are agreed in writing.

Talk to us

Tell us how you handle RFQ and quote comparison today.

A spreadsheet, a register or another system: say which, and we will tell you plainly what is worth changing.

What happens after you share your requirements

  1. A senior engineer reads your answers. Nobody phones first.
  2. Within one business day you get a written note: what we understood, what we would start with, and the questions we still have.
  3. If it fits, a proposal follows with the order of work, what we need from you and what you receive at each step.
  4. No call is booked and nothing is paid until you have read the note. Your details stay with us.

Start with your requirements

Seven short steps that tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads them before anyone gets in touch.

Share your requirements